In-process metrics for software testing
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
In-process metrics for software testing
In Chapter 9 we discussed quality management models with examples of in-process metrics and reports. The models cover both the front-end design and coding activities and the back-end testing phases of development. The focus of the in-process data and reports, however, are geared toward the design review and code inspection data, although testing data is included. This chapter provides a more de...
متن کاملMetrics for Software Testing: Managing with Facts: Part 2: Process Metrics
In the next three articles in the series, we’ll look at specific types of metrics. In this article, we will take up process metrics. Process metrics can help us understand the quality capability of the software engineering process as well as the testing capability of the software testing process. Understanding these capabilities is a pre-requisite to rational, fact-driven process improvement de...
متن کاملProcess-Oriented Metrics for Software Architecture Adaptability
Adaptability is important to the survival and success of just about any software system, especially due to the rapid changes in technology, organizational structure, human perception and needs. Measurement of the degree to which a software system is adaptable to such changes is often times of a critical concern to software practitioners. This paper proposes a framework, POMSAA (ProcessOriented ...
متن کاملProcess-Oriented Metrics for Software Architecture Changeability
Changeability is an important non-functional requirement (NFR) for software systems and evaluation of software changeability will be helpful for software practitioners. Briefly stated, changeability is the ease with which software system can be changed or modified. It is widely accepted that NFRs such as changeability should be incorporated in the architectural stage of software development its...
متن کاملSoftware Quality, Software Process, and Software Testing
Software testing should play a major role in the de nition and improvement of software development processes, because testing is the most precise, most easily measured and controlled part of the software lifecycle. However, unless testing goals are clearly related to true measurements of software quality, the testing may appear to improve, but the software will not. Much of current testing theo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IBM Systems Journal
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0018-8670
DOI: 10.1147/sj.401.0220